NoOp wrote:
On 10/18/2007 06:53 PM, Charlie Seaman wrote:
And, if we're really picking at things, ">98", would really not be
inclusive of 98, since the ">" means "greater than" not "greater than or
equal to". I thought of explaining that but really did not want to get
into the website being wrong.
Charlie: that's a *very* good point actually. Particularly when
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html shows:
<quote>
Microsoft Windows
* Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000 (Service Pack 2 or higher),
Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista (enhanced Vista integration from
version 2.2)
</quote>
Now, even if someone new actually bothers to look at the requirements
page, they may find the "Windows Vista (enhanced Vista integration from
version 2.2)" confusing. Does this mean I need 2.2? Which versions of
Vista, etc. etc.
In the past, there have been other complaints/threads regarding this
issue, but I've yet to see it fixed. IMO a great many of the "can this
be installed on" questions could be cleared up by simply fixing the OOo
website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you know how to go about that? (getting the OOo website changed)
--
Thanks.
Yours,
**//Charlie
//***/Charles D. Seaman/**/
/* 770-617-1214
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
