On 10/18/2007 06:53 PM, Charlie Seaman wrote: > > And, if we're really picking at things, ">98", would really not be > inclusive of 98, since the ">" means "greater than" not "greater than or > equal to". I thought of explaining that but really did not want to get > into the website being wrong.
Charlie: that's a *very* good point actually. Particularly when http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html shows: <quote> Microsoft Windows * Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000 (Service Pack 2 or higher), Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista (enhanced Vista integration from version 2.2) </quote> Now, even if someone new actually bothers to look at the requirements page, they may find the "Windows Vista (enhanced Vista integration from version 2.2)" confusing. Does this mean I need 2.2? Which versions of Vista, etc. etc. In the past, there have been other complaints/threads regarding this issue, but I've yet to see it fixed. IMO a great many of the "can this be installed on" questions could be cleared up by simply fixing the OOo website. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]