On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:59:24 -0600 Bruce Roorda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do agree that cutting the previous messages down to essentials is a > good idea. Which, of course, you failed to do. So I guess it's a good idea in theory only? Incidentally, your ISP (softhome.net) is bouncing emails sent through my mailserver due to the fact that they erroneously categorize it as a dynamic address, which it is not. You can prove it by pinging melvilletheatre.com and see what string is returned -- hint: it contains the word "static". You might want to jump on them about that. My email server isn't that important in the greater scheme of things, but who knows how many more legitimate mailservers they are bouncing as well. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
