On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:46:53 -0700 Bob Estes wrote: > > > > In ageneralised *e-mail* "discussion" an email is sent To one person > > (or more) and cc several others. Reply sends the reply *only* to the > > sender of the message being replied to; Reply All sends the message > > to that person plus all those To'd and cc'd on the message being > > replied to (except, of course, the person actualy doing the Reply > > All). > > > > It has never been clear to me why a *News* reader should have both > > options. > > > > > Thanks, Harold. That clears up some misunderstanding for me. I > recall some discussion recently about the need to cc: the original > sender if the message came through the moderator. Wouldn't the "Reply > All" function send a reply to the original sender? >
Yep, thats how i CC the OP when they are non list members (moderated posters). -- Michael All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
