mike scott wrote:
> On 22 May 2008 at 3:39, Drew Jensen wrote:
> 
>> Michael Adams wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:20:02 +0100
>>> mike scott wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>> Unless their version starts acquiring incompatible extensions.
>>>>
>>>> Isn't this what happened with java? (Or maybe I remember wrongly.)
>>>>
>>>>     
>>> Are you thinking JScript, Microsofts answer to Netscapes Javascript?
>>>
>>>   
>> I think he is referring to -
>>
>> Microsoft started made some changes to to the java language's 
>> implementation for Windows platforms
>> ---- primarily to address performance issues as I recall
>>
>> SUN threatened to sue
>>
>> They stopped.
>>
>> The outcome of that little exchange between the two companies was the 
>> birth of a totally new language - C#
> 
> That's probably it. Although my rather vague recollection is that 
> there were some compatibility issues which went against Sun's 
> licensing conditions.
> 
> It just seemed that MS, after taking ODF on board, would be in an ace 
> position to wreck its compatibility across systems, blame others, 
> then push their own as the One True Standard. Maybe I'm just too 
> cynical :-)

NO you're not! 'Ballmer has as much ethics and morals as a rabid grizzly.

Fred

-- 
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,
and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal
sharing of misery." - Sir Winston Churchill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to