John Boyle wrote:
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
In early 64-bit versions of Fedora, there were 64-bit released issues so I needed to use the official release. In Fedora-8, I needed to use the Fedora release because of an issue supporting java. Now, in Fedora-9, I need to use the official release because of a bug relating to macros.

To Andrew Pitonyak: There is also the issue of the NVIDIA drivers, which does not seem to be a concern to the developers, although Ver. 10 is supposed to address that problem. I hope so! I use ver. 8 whitch works well with NVIDIA drivers, which I cannot figure out why ver. 9 does not! :-(
The specific issue that I reported with 64-bit Fedora 9 was fixed almost immediately, but will not likely make it to distribution for a while. As such, I am using the latest OOo versions. Well, I am using the developer builds because I am working on 3.0 documentation. This allows me to see the differences, document them, and grab appropriate screen shots.

As for the NVidia drivers... Fedora 9 shipped with a beta version of the xorg driver. The nVidia drivers could not compile against the beta, so you simply could not use it. That problem was fixed recently. I noticed a few issues that did not exist using the standard fedora driver, however.

First, I use Crossover office to run a program called Enterprise Architect. To use CrossoverOffice, I must issue the command:

sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0

ok, then I can run Enterprise Architect. Using the standard driver, everything is fine. Using the nvidia driver, however, some of the menus and fonts are scrambled. This problem did not exist with the other driver.

--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
Info:  http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to