Excellent ! Thank you Robert. Your suggestion works! jeff
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 11:53 +0000, Robert Greig wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > I'm currently working on an AMQP gateway for the JBoss ESB using the > > QPid Java client libraries. I have gotten it to work ... but did > > experience a few issues along the way. I made modifications to the > > JBoss ESB to accommodate the problem I was experiencing. Please see the > > ESB forum post for details : > > > > http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=150019 > > The idea is that when you are referring to connection factories or > destinations you don't include the prefix "destination" or > "connectionfactory". So in your example you should make the following > change: > > <jms-provider name="JMS" > connection-factory="connectionfactory.qpidConnectionFactory"> > <property name="jndi-prefixes" > value="connectionfactory.,destination." /> > <property name="java.naming.factory.initial" > value="org.apache.qpid.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory"/> > <property name="connectionfactory.qpidConnectionFactory" > > value="amqp://guest:gu...@clientid/virtualHost?brokerlist='tcp://ratwater:5672'"/> > <property name="destination.Alpha_Co" > value="direct://usmc.tracks/Alpha_Co_queue?routingkey='Alpha_Co_key'"/> > <jms-bus busid="quickstartGwChannel"> > <jms-message-filter dest-type="QUEUE" > dest-name="Alpha_Co" /><!-- NOTE THE CHANGE ON THIS LINE --> > </jms-bus> > </jms-provider> > > The reason for having prefixes is that the config is just simple > name/value pairs and there is no other way to distinguish the "type" > of the item being defined. This is even the case in the example above > - for example, the connection factory is not distinguishable from the > destination unless you want to attempt to parse each item and figure > it out which is messy. > > However when looking up the items from JNDI it is redundant to keep > the prefix, so you don't use them. If you migrate to using an LDAP > server for example, which allows a hierarchy for the names, you would > not want to have to put prefixes in the names (or change the rest of > your config or code to change the lookup name). > > ActiveMQ also does this. I am not sure about other providers (which > may or may not provide a properties file facade for JNDI). > > I hope this clarifies things. > > Robert -- Jeffrey Bride RedHat / JBoss 303-523-7885 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
