On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:07 PM Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31/10/2019 5:38 pm, Ted Ross wrote: > > I think the choice that we would consider making configurable > > would be: Release all multicast deliveries for which there is no > consumer > > (the present behavior); or Withhold credit for sender links on multicast > > addresses for which there is no consumer. > > > Isn't that choice better stated as always grant credit for multicast > addresses or withold credit when there are no consumers? In the latter > case you would presumably still release a message that was sent because > there was a consumer when the link attached but it has gone away now. >
Yes, but there's no infinite cycling scenario since the router will drain the credit and stop the sender in this case. This is the same as the anycast behavior. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
