Chris, You wouldn't by chance be running the old bigevil ruleset would you. We heard that the author went mad and the final product started ripping the souls out of their systems...
Just a thought :) Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM > To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: RE: scan times up! > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM > >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > >Subject: Re: scan times up! > > > > > >On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > >> Well... > >> > >> ver avg scan time > >> 2.4x 2.7 seconds > >> 3.0 30.4 seconds > >> > >> OH MY! Network test :) > >> > >> Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;) > > > >Have you got a local (on-site, preferably on-machine) DNS cache ? > >This makes a lot of difference to the DNS-based network tests (which > >is to say, most of them). One mail probably won't see much difference, > >but when the next one comes in, many of its lookups are > >already cached :) > > > > This is also on my list of TTD. I'm running on some very old iron as well. > The 5 children might be bothering the sysem a little. I may reduce that. > > I'll post some feedback if my users ever let me get back to it :) > > --Chris
