Re: Interesting NW article

[C-Store Christoph Peter]

I agree. After some minor issues SA works perfect for us. It runs perfect on 
a small PPro 200 machine, and gets almost 100 %. I have one or two spam 
mails getting through.

I´m pretty happy with SA.
Cheers,
C-Store Hard- und Software GmbH
Christoph Peter
Düstere Straße 20
37073 Göttingen
http://www.c-store.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carnegie, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:22 PM
Subject: RE: Interesting NW article


Well, from our implementation I would say that this article is junk.  We
are running SA with pretty much default config and no Bayes and are
getting about 97% with the only FPs being some mass mailings from
vendors (MS Technet for example).  If we looked at turning on Bayes then
this product would probably be the best out there.
This quote "SpamAssassin requires a significant amount of integration
work to make an enterprise-class installation succeed" is bs, we did the
upgrade from 2.64 which worked great and have not seen any issues and
the amount of work to implement was about an hour.
So keep up the great work guys and ignore these "technical" reviews.