I haven't any error running spamassassin --lint, will try on production soon.
$ spamassassin -V 
SpamAssassin version 3.4.1
  running on Perl version 5.24.3
 
 Cheers
  Giovanni

On 11/22/17 08:32, Peter wrote:
> 
> Hi Kevin,
>  
> I am just trying this and getting the same error.  Did you work out how to 
> fix this?
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> Peter
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
> 
> On 25/10/2017 at 6:41 PM Kevin Miller wrote:
> 
>     Implemented it on one of my tier 2 mx hosts.  No hits so far, but I’m 
> not sure if it’s working or not.  Running spamassasin –lint returns a 
> warning:
> 
>       root@mx2:/etc/spamassassin# spamassassin --lint
> 
>       Oct 25 09:39:35.403 [15095] warn: Use of uninitialized value in regexp 
> compilation at /etc/spamassassin/HashBL.pm line 52.
> 
>      
> 
>     ...Kevin
> 
>     --
> 
>     Kevin Miller
> 
>     Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
> 
>     155 South Seward Street
> 
>     Juneau, Alaska 99801
> 
>     Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 
> 307357
> 
>      
> 
>     *From:*Michael Grant [mailto:michael.gr...@gmail.com]
>     *Sent:* Sunday, October 15, 2017 2:02 AM
>     *To:* SpamAssassin Users
>     *Subject:* MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query
> 
>      
> 
>     Has anyone tried out the the MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) HashBL.pm with 
> Spamassassin from msbl.org <http://msbl.org> and possibly considered 
> packaging this module (available from this page: 
> http://msbl.org/ebl-implementation.html) with SpamAssassin (perhaps in a 
> forthcoming release)?  rSpamD already has internal support for the EBL. So I 
> believe the MSBL folks are for this sort of thing in general.
> 
>      
> 
>     This plugin looks through the message (not just headers) for email 
> addresses which have been identified as email drop boxes for scams like 419 
> advance fee fraud.  It then looks hashes of these addresses up in a 
> blocklist. 
> 
>      
> 
>     I'm not affiliated with these folks.  I do however use this module in my 
> setup though and find it catches a bunch of things we wouldn't have otherwise 
> caught.
> 
>      
> 
>     Michael Grant
> 

Reply via email to