On 28.11.17 19:39, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I'm having more and more problems with the HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_* set
of rules recently generating false positives.
On 30/11/17 12:45, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
those have lower scorew with BAYES and network rules enabled.
configure BAYES and enable netowrk rules...
On 01.12.17 10:17, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Hi. I have BAYES enabled and DNSBL's enabled (I assume that's what
you mean by network rules?). I still think that a score of 1.6 is
quite a lot, considering that so many emails nowadays contain either
an embedded logo in the signature, with just a few words (in a quick
email reply, for example), or even images inserted, instead of
attached to the email. Please see below an example of a SA report:
1.6 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
2.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4808]
configuring BAYES includes training it, so your mail don't get 0.48 score.
2.5 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
now I really wonder why you blame HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24, when BAYES_50 and
PYZOR_CHECK gave you higher score each?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
