Hi,
Is it possible to at least enforce that the message-ID has a valid domain?
Received: from thomas-krueger.local
(221.208.196.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.196.208.221])
by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id
r16sm1186220uai.7.2017.12.28.18.04.13
for <amy.c...@example.com>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:04:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: janda02.com
Message-ID: <5b974eb73ed9c2d1b630f4b600191771@zfimvuyb.gwbba>
From: "Apple Store" <mysendernuflwcix@zfimvuyb.gwbba>
To: <amy.c...@example.com>
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:41 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2018, at 04:26, Rupert Gallagher r...@protonmail.com> wrote:
>> Note taken. We still abide to the duties and recommendations, and expect
>> well-behaved servers do the same, by identifying themselves. We cross-check,
>> and if they lie, we block them.
>
> rejecting because they spoof a domain in the MID is one thing. Rejecting an
> email because you misunderstood the RFC and don't see a valid domain name is
> an entirely different thing.
>
>
> --
> And, while it was regarded as pretty good evidence of criminality to be
> living in a slum, for some reason owning a whole street of them merely
> got you invited to the very best social occasions.
>
