On 15.04.18 11:55, Computer Bob wrote:
Here is a root scan: https://pastebin.com/qdXMRzKb
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.2 required=4.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_PASS,
URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Here is the same run under spamd: https://pastebin.com/SvvYptYv
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_PASS
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
the main two differences are AWL and BAYES_00 which means
1. your spamd' bayes database is mistrained
2. you apparently should disable AWL at least until you train bayes
properly.
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, John Hardin wrote:
Actually, it's using user-specific (vs. global) bayes databases,
and apparently only root's database is being trained.
Define a shared Bayes database that all users can read and use that.
On 15.04.18 11:13, John Hardin wrote:
...or train as spamd rather than as root...
the root's BAYES DB seems untrained.
the spamd's is trained, but badly (re-training should help there).
the question is:
how is spamassassin used? running spamd? does spamd run with "-u" option?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
