> I use debian, and it uses GPG signatures. so I understand that sha-1 > issue even less Which release do you worry about? Even oldoldstable is at 3.4.2, which should be fine according to > If you do not update to 3.4.2 or later, you will be stuck at the last > ruleset with SHA-1 signatures.
- ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.4 available Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.4 availa... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.4 av... John Hardin
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.... Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin ... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssa... Henrik K
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache Spam... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Henrik K
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Damian
- What am I dping wrong... Anders Gustafsson
- Re: What am I dping w... Damian
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... RW
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Damian
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... John Hardin
- Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache ... Chris
- [CVE-2020-1931] Apache SpamAssassin Nefarious ... Kevin A. McGrail