1) You would not know fascism if it jumped up and bit your nose off.
2) You try to force your nonsense on me and I'll force my nonsense on you.
Square?
{^_^}
On 20200710 15:26:49, Charles Sprickman wrote:
What makes you think anyone on the list wants to hear your complaints and your
snide crypto-fascism?
Take it private or open an issue in the bug tracker.
On Jul 10, 2020, at 6:01 PM, jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote:
And every ancillary script sysadmins have written has to be rewritten. Every
user_prefs has to be rewritten. You are forcing a boatload of hurt on innocent
people. This is purely lifting a leg and peeing on something to mark it as
YOURS. Isn't that rather selfish?
{^_^}
On 20200710 13:27:45, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hello all,
A common question we are receiving is what about using this terminology
instead, for example allow/deny.
The use of welcomelist and blocklist has evolved from discussions since
April and work done creating patches. We found that using these names
of welcomelist and blocklist are non offensive, reasonably descriptive
and since they still start with W and B, we avoid renaming things like
RBLs, WLBL, DNSBL, etc. This should help minimize the disruption when
4.0 is released with the new configuration options.
Regards,
KAM
