From: "Dallas Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 07:37 -0600, DAve wrote:
And mine, note that these are *post* MailScanner and RBLs, which are
running on my mail gateways. By the time SA gets the mail I've pruned
anywhere from 45% to 75% of the messages, depending on the day.
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
1 URIBL_BLACK 162360 8.88 55.25 88.86 2.10
is that 2% ham hits really missed spam or are you having false positives
due to URIBL_BLACK??
I am inclined to think there are a very few false positives, one every
couple thousand or so. Spam that manages to sail through, here, do not
seem to get marked with any BL rules as a general rule. That is why it
scores 3.0 rather than a higher number. {^_-}
{^_^}
