On Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 8:43:30 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote: > Here's mine after making it through the RBL lists & Greylisting:
> TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM > %OFHAM > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 HTML_MESSAGE 887 6.42 12.60 72.53 > 63.65 > 2 BAYES_99 807 5.84 11.46 65.99 > 0.22 > 3 DCC_CHECK 718 5.20 10.20 58.71 > 15.37 > 4 URIBL_BLACK 600 4.34 8.52 49.06 > 1.63 > 5 LG_4C_2V_3C 370 2.68 5.25 30.25 > 15.26 > 6 DIGEST_MULTIPLE 368 2.66 5.23 30.09 > 1.12 > 7 RAZOR2_CHECK 367 2.66 5.21 30.01 > 0.91 > 8 URIBL_OB_SURBL 320 2.32 4.54 26.17 > 0.00 > 9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 311 2.25 4.42 25.43 > 0.17 > 10 URIBL_WS_SURBL 289 2.09 4.10 23.63 > 0.03 I'd recommend adding a rule for jp.surbl.org if you don't already have one. It's generally our best performing list currently. A sample rule is mentioned under "jp - jwSpamSpy + Prolocation data source" on our Quick Start page: http://www.surbl.org/ Are you perhaps using a pre-3.1 version of SpamAssassin? Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
