On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Randal, Phil wrote: > > undetected). Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected > > text back to SA? There should be enough variants of spam > > worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the ones from images. > > I think so. Some of the words would be perfectly legitimate in the text > of emails but rarely found in attached legitimate images. > > Quite apart from the fact that Spamassassin isn't designed for > "reinjection".
FWIW, 3.2 adds in support to have rendering of non-text parts. So a plugin
could, for instance, OCR text from an image, and then the normal body rules
and such would be able to use that information.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"... and now we have a parallelogram, or at least we would if I could draw."
- Prof. Farr
pgp0DlEmXyPiF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
