John Rudd wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
This doesn't mean SPF is crap.
As SPF currently exists, it is crap.
Let's not forget that the primary purpose of SPF was/is to cut down on
spammers forging legitimate domains.
In that, it's been less craptacular than some approaches.
No one solution is going to be the silver bullet against the spam problem.
--
Jay Chandler
Network Administrator, Chapman University
714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today's Excuse: The mainframe needs to rest. It's getting old, you know.
