Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why not find which rules are triggered by your message
I already did - see my original post at the start of this thread. > Can't be too hard, spammers do it all the time. That's my point - why should I have to behave like a spammer in order to avoid getting classed as one? > If you're not sending spam, why does it look like spam? Find out and > fix the problem! I did that. The problem that needs fixing is SpamAssassin. It is triggering on things that are nothing to do with spam (for example, RFC-compliant use of multipart/related).
