-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
jonathan schrieb: > For a high-volume site, is there any reason to not be running > spamc/spamd over amavisd/spamassassin? Specifically, can you use all of Amavisd uses the SpamAssassin Perl module directly (ie not really spamc or spamd). For a high-volume site, amavisd has advantages if you want to do additional checks besides SA (eg virus checking). If you only want to run SA, you could avoid the overhead of amavisd. > the various perl plugins (imageinfo, pdfinfo, botnet, etc...)? Are I run various incarnations of SA (through sendmail-milter, through amavisd, spamc as a Postfix content_filter), and I can access any plugin I want in any of these environments. Being able to run a plugin is more a Perl issue (having the necessary @INC paths for the user running the "container", filesystem permissions etc) than a SA issue. - -- Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG1wKVxbHw2nyi/okRAvoiAJ9Dj3d1PyC4aD9t4a5U6SEnK143WwCZAX0h 3PquILgowvAxKq5QlJR89SE= =88lT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
