On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 03:13 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, ram wrote: > > > Sorry I meant "like spamcop" .. I think I must proof-read my own mail > > now before Ctrl-Enter :-) > > The problem with SpamCop is: the two step reporting process makes things a > bear to do. I understand the logic behind it, but once or twice I've > taken a couple hundred spam emails and spamassassin -r'd it...annoying as > hell. > But people still report to spamcop. And you must agree spamcop has got *much* better now.
If DNSWL has an automated reporting system like that I can vouch I will myself use such a reporting system without hassles. Especially because I would not like the excellent idea of DNSWL to fail > I'd like it if they open-sourced their analysis engine so people could use > it to report spam privately, but I know it's not happening. > I know we opensource guys despise anything that is not. Anyway that is not rocket science , it seems pretty straightforward to use one of our own
