-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Alex Woick schrieb: > [Spamcop] > I understand the two step reporting process too, and I too find it > annoying and timeconsuming to ack my (manually reviewed) 50 spams per > day to them, so I ceased to do it. There exist scripts for ack'ing > automatically, but this is not the intention of this process, so this is > no alternative for me. I don't speak for Spamcop, but I do speak for dnswl.org. From our experience I can tell that a manual review process is very important to ensure data quality. At least in the context of dnswl.org, there is little value in reporting for the sake of reporting alone -- there needs to be some quality control involved, or otherwise we run a high risk of including unwanted IP addresses. Having said that, we of course welcome all reports on false positives, especially on IP addresses with a "low", "med" or "hi" score, and we welcome all notifications of mailservers we do not yet know about. - -- Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHIggQxbHw2nyi/okRAludAKC14sT7Ff3Ax4L9zpC/fWHx/xyUAwCfSUZ1 WB4q6mV08fa4Yhyx+aUtbEs= =3yG4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
