> It's not a matter of cultural imperialism, if that's what you're getting at. > > It's an acknowledgment of the importance of the "rule of law" in cyberspace.
Except that I don't think it is anything close to a rule of law, but rather a sign of short view. As I said, I doubt you ever got any spam from my organisation (either originated from, or relayed). > Some countries enforce anti-spam, anti-trespass laws. Others lack them > or don't enforce them. The attitude goes by organisation, not by country. > When these countries put some teeth into the enforcement of their laws, > then they will stop being blacklisted. Plus if we would to ban the oginating country for 50% of spam (not my figure), USA should be banned. But hey, that is a too big cut from Internet, so in some way it is cultural imperialism. Bests, Olivier
