Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 03.07.08 13:22, Henrik K wrote: > > > If lesser registrar means that it's probably ham, why couldn't > someone use > that to add some negative scores or use it as a part of whitelist > trustworthiness? Even if it's handful of domains, it's useful. If you > could > get the registrar data without expensive lookups.. > > > what if spammers start register domains using those registrars? > > > The registrars I'm talking about are extremely expensive and very exclusive. > Spammers couldn't afford it.
Big sloppy/lousy corporation can afford it. -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most people can't understand how others can blow their noses differently than they do. -- Turgenev
