Hello, I just received an e-mail with the following report:
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: 0.0 URIBL_RED Contains an URL listed in the URIBL redlist [URIs: unclassified.de] 0.2 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist [URIs: unclassified.de] 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: unclassified.de] 5.0 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or virusbot [botnet0.8,ip=(...)] 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL [89.183.23.141 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to trusted network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
(...) contains information about the sending host that should not matter here.
The message is a reply to a message from me. It contains my text quoted, complete with my previous signature that also has the link to http://unclassified.de. I was a bit surprised about the high spam score of 5.0 and looked at the report. It says that "unclassified.de" is on URIBL. I could not believe that and checked in at their site. But they say it is *not* on the list. So what happened here? How can SA (3.2.4) give spam points for a problem that is completely wrong?
-- Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de