Ron Smith wrote on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:11:32 -0400: > Kai, I tried to explain that I didn't get that email response.
Sure you got that reply. You quoted his mail. But you didn't answer the question about memory. That's all I pointed out - and got this snap back. Ron, in case you didn't understand at all: you claim there is a memory issue. But you have not provided any stats to date that back this claim. A reduction in your "inactive memory" (whatever that is) is no proof for nothing at all. What you want to do is check the memory usage of *spamd* and related software and provide figures how big it is (absolute and relative), how it grows etc. And thinking about this "inactive memory" thing I think you should do some research and get information (also to us) what this actually means. Without any knowledge about the naming conventions on your Mac OS a growing "inactive memory" would actually mean something *positive* to me as it might indicate that less memory is in use than before. That's a good thing, isn't it? That naming may be a misleading trap of your Mac OS. So, you should explain it. And that "Activity viewer" (again, whatever that is) may give inaccurate figures, anyway. You need to get some figures from command-line tools. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
