> > On 12.11.08 21:56, Peter Nitschke wrote: > > > Read the entire sentence. > > > > > > "Please note that free public DNS queries for organizations smaller > > > than 1,000 users or processing fewer than 250,000 messages per > > > day is unchanged. " > > > > If you satisfy either requirement ( <1,000 users OR <250,000 mails) then > > > you still get free access.
> On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > In another mail to surbl list it was mentioned that any organization who has > > more than >1000 users or processes >250000 messages per day, the feed must > > be set up and charge paid. > > > > That meant you need to have <=1000 users AND process <=250000 messages daily > > (average) to have free access. On 12.11.08 15:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Hmm, that's not what http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html says about > the FQS. It states OR there, so Peter's understanding seems to be > correct. Yes, however Jeff Chan's message posted to surbl-announce mailing list stated differently. When I asked which logic chould be used, Jeff replied that the one posted in the ML. I haven't looked at the policy before now and I see it states something else. However as Jeff said in the latter mail, number of users is the key... ...although they only can count number of queries from their point :) > That's kind of fuzzy and mind boggling. ;) Anyway, I guess all this > should be taken with a grain of salt. In particular "posts to lists" > that accidentally might have changed the logic by not applying proper > boolean logic when talking about the subject. That's it... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Where do you want to go to die?" [Microsoft]
