On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Gerald Turner wrote:
- There are other cases when you don't want to reject (mail to
ab...@example.com, ... etc).
That's the other problem I'm trying to solve (don't reject mail sent to
these "quasi-spamtrap" addresses, simply discard) - I can see how to do
it now with custom rules checked in X-Spam-Status header.
How is abuse@ a spamtrap address, even quasi-?
I would suggest that discarding mail to abuse@ is a bad idea, too. How
would someone report abuse of your systems with evidence, if the evidence
attached to the report gets the report discarded?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Men by their constitutions are naturally divided in to two parties:
1. Those who fear and distrust the people and wish to draw all
powers from them into the hands of the higher classes. 2. Those who
identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them,
cherish and consider them as the most honest and safe, although not
the most wise, depository of the public interests.
-- Thomas Jefferson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 days until Benjamin Franklin's 303rd Birthday
