IPv6 will not banish NAT. It's too useful for other purposes.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 18:01 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> On Thu, February 12, 2009 19:29, John Hardin wrote: >> > Ultimately that's what you have to do. The only way to automatically >> > filter 100% of spam is to unplug your MTA from the 'net. >> >> unless one implement policyd to whitelist known senders and greylist >> the rest and or whois sender ip and or sender domain, shame its not >> pr recipient anywhere, in a perfect world there was no spam then >> > I've heard it said that IPV6 will put paid to privacy for > whistle-blowers etc because, with that fully implemented, NAT will > vanish and all IPs will be unique. By implication they'd be unspoofable, > though I'm not sure I believe that. However, if that's true it will also > leave the spammers out in the open. > > Martin > > >
