> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:46 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > * Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> [2009-07-30 16:35]: > > > On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > > > > I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the > > > > reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
On 30.07.09 21:06, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > SA does not do the DNS lookup, but depends on the MTA doing so and > recording the result in the Received header. the MTA (sendmail?) did put a "may be forged" into Received: line, In which case SA shouldl ignore the hostname. Now the question is, if it does, and the reported X-Spam headers indicates it does not, which is a bug then. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".
