On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 23:56 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > May I point out, that while you may find the language crude -- it isn't > language that would violate FTC standards in that in used any of the > 7 or so 'unmentionable words'...
It's not about words on their own -- it's about how they are being used, and their meaning in context. > BTW, I've never even 'heard' or seen his name before this post. Must have been a warm and cozy place, the rock you've been hiding under. ;) You missed a 3 digit figure of posts and uncalled-for off-topic rants within a few weeks. > If I was talking with [...] I just apply my linguistic filter and > attempt to get the meaning. Sic. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}