On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 19:22 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:11 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> >
> >> For example, when there are 5-10 recipients, assign 1 point; 11
> >> recipients and more - assign 2 points.
> >
> > Here's the rule(s) I use. They were posted here on the list quite awhile
> > back:
> >
> > describe TO_TOO_MANY To: too many recipients
> > header TO_TOO_MANY To =~ /(?:,[^,]{1,80}){20}/
> > score TO_TOO_MANY 0.3
> >
> > describe TO_WAY_TOO_MANY To: way too many recipients
> > header TO_WAY_TOO_MANY To =~ /(?:,[^,]{1,80}){20}/
> > score TO_WAY_TOO_MANY 0.3
>
> TO_WAY_TOO_MANY should have something higher than 20 addresses if that's
> how many will trigger TO_TOO_MANY. With them set to the same number, they
> are duplicate rules and SA collapses them - only one will ever hit.
>
> I use 30 and 50.
>
You're right John, I thought I'd changed the numbers when I installed,
guess not. I'll do it now.Chris -- KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
