Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Alex wrote: >> > I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how >> > it works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, >> > and I wondered if I was doing something wrong. > > On 26.11.09 23:09, Per Jessen wrote: >> Don't use UCEPROTECT for catching, only for scoring. > > well, there are some postmasters/hosts using even L2 and L3 at SMTP > time for rejecting.
I have no doubt there is. Doesn't change anything for uceprotect, imo. > We have ticket open where a host is rejecting your mail because IP in > Received: is in backscatterer.org. Yeah, I know (which ticket is this?) > > Some people don't know what they are doing. Too many, unfortunately. /Per Jessen, Zürich
