On 2010-02-15 15:04, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
1: The participation record is optional, so you only use it if you
want "everything else" to be rejected.
This is why I would support mtamark... It permits the sysadmin to
determine the default behaviour for his IP range, rather than defining a
dangerous default in the client.
In what way does the above define a dangerous default?
The default in the statement above is to consider a domain as *not*
participating unless otherwise stated by whoever manages the DNS for the
domain.
If the domain does not participate it should not be punished when a MTX
record isn't found.
Regards
/Jonas
--
Jonas Eckerman
Fruktträdet & Förbundet Sveriges Dövblinda
http://www.fsdb.org/
http://www.frukt.org/
http://whatever.frukt.org/
