> On 07.10.10 13:28, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > I see what you mean, but, well, I personally would vote "no" to this. > > > > I'm really tired of all that mailing lists which can't stay from > > attaching their own banners and general hints at the message tail.
I fully agree. > not mentioning breakage of e.g. DKIM. > btw, not to be off-topic at least once, can SA comply with this? Not breaking DKIM signature? Yes, on both accounts: - the users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list does not break signatures (thankfully it does not modify Subject or add footers/signatures); - DKIM signatures in messages passed through SpamAssassin are normally not invalidated, unless one configures SA to modify Subject or to add a report to the body of a message. Mark
