On 6/10/2011 7:14 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
You are generally correct about the numerical (actually lexical) order, though it doesn't apply to the files you are talking about. The mentioned 72_active and 20_sought are in different sa-update channels. Now, the bad thing about this is that updates_spamassassin_org.cf is lexically *after* sought_rules_yerp_org.cf in your rule update dir. Which means the more recent rules in the dedicated Sought channel are overwritten by the stock rules... This merely requires a re-ordering hack, though. A symlink zzz_sought.cf in your rule updates dir, pointing at the channel generated cf should do. These channel cf files only hold include statements, to pull in the actual cf files in the per-channel dir.
Without a re-ordering hack, does this mean mean that essentially EVERYONE is using SOUGHT wrong? This is a bit worrisome.
Warren
