> That said, I would suggest to not decouple bayes from SA, since I wouldn't > see any advantage > in this approach and you would rather miss the a bayes score from the SA > totals. You would > end having more FPs due to the bayesian mailer running apart and needing > special score > thresholds in SA.
That was my thinking as well. Thanks for confirming that I'm on the right track. > I would also suggest to avoid using amavisd and the like to run SA tests: > that application supplies some message routing schemes which are really > useful with > "simple" mail exchangers, but that may complicate things a lot with a > mailet-based design. I > would suggest to use spamd instead. Hmm, that's something I hadn't thought about. As it is, it's not a problem. James 3.0 includes a mailet that talks directly to spamd, and we backported it to the version we're running. > Also, to complete the system, I recall there were some AV-mailets at the age. > If possible use > them before SA to catch message carrying viruses. Absolutely - we've got ClamAV running first, before anything touches SA, and using some of the SaneSecurity signature sets to catch additional malware. Thanks! Kelson Vibber TollFreeForwarding.com, Development
