Am 22.03.2012 10:33, schrieb Axb: > On 03/22/2012 10:19 AM, Per Jessen wrote: >> Robert Schetterer wrote: >> >>> Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen: >>>> Robert Schetterer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen: >>>>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains : >>>>>> >>>>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains >>>>>> >>>>>> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as: >>>>>> >>>>>> You should check your status update and see if it changed >>>>>> This method of language learning is super easy. >>>>>> Please confirm that this update is accurate. >>>>>> Teach yourself a new foreign language in 10 days >>>>>> >>>>>> Just being curious. Yesterday I got another 10 different domains. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Per, nothing special like that, was noticed here >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks Robert - amazing that nobody else seems to have noticed. I've >>>> added a rule to catch some of them, but yesterday I still got another >>>> 15 brand-new such domains. >>> >>> sorry i dont follow new spam domains, until there is no significant >>> rise but if grepped your domains yesterday on few servers with no >>> result >> >> I don't normally follow them either, but these are coming through to one >> of my personal addresses. It's also the rate of change that is >> interesting - I very rarely see two emails with the same link. > > Aren't the URIs being detected by SBL/DBL/SURBL/URIBL ? >
domain name related rbls/lists are mostly not making very much sense also tagging by "new domains" isnt very helpfull that all may lead to too much false positives but policies like that must be decided by the postmaster related to his local needs -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
