On 08/16/2012 07:01 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
I've noticed that this problem is ongoing, my upgrade to 3.3.2
notwithstanding.
To restate the question: My mailbox contains between 10-20 false positives
every morning. Before reporting them, I pass them through the spam
assassin filter again. About 20-25% are flagged as spam the second time
through.
The most obvious explanation, which I should've raised the first time, is
that these entries get added to the BL databases during the intervening 6-8
hours. If so, this understanding will be very helpful.
Can anyone weigh in?
False positive or negatives?
False positive: ham tagged as spam
False negative: spam NOT tagged as spam
if false negatives, could put some samples on pastebins so we can see
which type you're missing and the rule hits they got?
