On 2/24/2013 12:58 PM, SM wrote:
At 13:42 21-02-2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Unless betting for minor sums such as a beer or a happy meal, I
generally won't get into RFC compliance arguments with DFS. My
reading was similar though there are some other RFCs that extend SMTP
and say things like "if you use ESMTP, you have to add with ESMTP to
the received headers".
The following is about ESMTP:
"For instance, servers MUST support the EHLO command even if they do
not implement any specific extensions and clients SHOULD
preferentially
utilize EHLO rather than HELO."
I'm referring to other RFCs such as 1651 which says:
7. Received: Header Field Annotation
SMTP servers are required to add an appropriate Received: field to
the headers of all messages they receive. A "with ESMTP" clause
should be added to this field when any SMTP service extensions are
used.
My point being that I don't know if there are more RFCs that govern
received header information. I've just happened to know that one.
Regards,
KAM
