On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Axb wrote:
On 08/14/2013 04:51 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 8/14/2013 9:49 AM, Nigel Smith wrote:
> >
> > This triggers :
> > * 30 ITS_RCVD_IN_ZEN RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus Zen
> > * [10.10.114.156 listed in zen.dnsbl]
>
> 10.X is a private network. Why is Zen listing it?
A better question is: why is the RBL check code even querying about an
RFC1918 address at all?
I can't think of any use case where that would be valid behavior. I'd
suggest this is worthy of a bugzilla entry.
If he borked his rbldnsd config badly, it could be possible.
What does the rbldnsd config have to do with whether or not a RBL lookup
on a RFC1918 address makes any sense?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice is justice, whereas "social justice" is code for one set
of rules for the rich, another for the poor; one set for whites,
another set for minorities; one set for straight men, another for
women and gays. In short, it's the opposite of actual justice.
-- Burt Prelutsky
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: the 68th anniversary of the end of World War II
