On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
> A better question is: why is the RBL check code even querying about > an RFC1918 address at all? > I can't think of any use case where that would be valid behavior. I'd > suggest this is worthy of a bugzilla entry. I can think of only one case and it's contrived: In unit- or regression-test suites. I agree that RBL lookups by default should skip bogus addresses like RFC1918 and multicast addresses, but there should be a way to override this for test purposes. Regards, David.
