On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:28:56 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
> Keeping more in the like and kind with the existing code in PMS, > wouldn't this be closer to what you need? Completely untested but > passed tests. Sure... I'm not picky about how it's implemented. ;) Just so long as there's an official API to get the test names and scores, I'm happy. Regards, David.
