Am 21.02.2015 um 14:49 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 17.02.15 13:25, ricky gutierrez wrote:Yes , only these two: reject_rbl_client pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,Am 17.02.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:why not reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org ? it makes exactly the same job, but halves number of queries....On 17.02.15 22:16, Reindl Harald wrote:it contains more zenhaus lists and hence more false positivesIt includes only one more which is CSS. some time before it was only sbl-xbl+pbl, and I have forgot about CSS addition
the problem is the SBL part which you can't treat with the same score as XBL/PBL/CSS while i would in general not recommend usage of "reject_rbl_client" at all, that's not score-based and is asking for troubles, below my weighting for "zen.spamhaus.org"
the first number is the postscreen-score, the second the spamassassin-score given both configured to reject starting with 8 points - normally you want every DNSBL result confirmed at least by one additional source and add at least sorbs or/and hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com to the mix
pbl.spamhaus.org 8 5.5 127.0.0.[10;11] ^127\.0\.0\.1[01]$ xbl.spamhaus.org 7 5.5 127.0.0.[4..7] ^127\.0\.0\.[4567]$ css.spamhaus.org 5 4.0 127.0.0.3 ^127\.0\.0\.3$ sbl.spamhaus.org 3 1.5 127.0.0.2 ^127\.0\.0\.2$
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
