On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> > > Am 23.09.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Philip Prindeville: >> Stating facts here, not giving an opinion. Not sure what’s up for debate. >>> >>> if it is empty it's <> aka Null-Sender and you really don't block that >>> because you violating RFC's, block sane autoreplies usng it to prevent >>> mail-loops and the subject indiactes one thing; you donät really understand >>> how email works >> >> Rejecting messages based on their content PERIOD is violating the RFC’s. >> What’s your point? > > do what you want - a empty envelope from is not a sign of spam > > I never said it was. What I said was that when it’s coming from a server that doesn’t except inbound messages (and hence can’t generate bounces) THEN it’s a sign of Spam.
