Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

[Reindl Harald]

Am 24.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Benny Pedersen:

Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-11-24 11:56:

it's the exim of the ISP

with old version of exim

it's still the exim of the ISP

it's the exim of the ISP

with old version of exim

it's still the exim of the ISP

again disable of rdns_none is not the solution, so why fokus on that?

because *it is* the solution damned when "make spamassassin exceptions
for the faulty isp headers" would do exactly the same, not fire the
rule and since it affects *every* mail, well disable it

no isp might recieve mail from more then one single ip / domains, so
solve rdns_none with disable is incorrect with score 0

you really don't understand it - it don't matter from where the ISP receives mail when the Received-header don't contain the reverse DNS in general

if the 3 header exeption is added it would still work on other isps spam
sources breaking rfc rules on how headers should be

and how does that matter for a local setup using fetchmail from *that* ISP?

spamassasssin is not a single rule spam scanner / tagger

and hence you disable the rules which don't match your environment

bah, upgrade exim is not that hard is it ?

it's still the exim of the ISP - DAMNED - go out and update it, i wish you success

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature