FEEDBACK for all who have contributed:
I have a result.
It seems that the 'internal_networks' is only adhered to *in the absence* of
a 'trusted_networks' entry. If I remove the 'trusted_networks', and simply
leave:
internal_networks 195.26.90.
then it is correctly applied:
X-Spam-Report:
* -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
*
I then confirmed this discovery be re-re-re-reading the LOCAL.CF wiki manual
which does suggest 'trusted' networks takes precedence and is a 'one or the
other' affair. So, if a TRUSTED entry exists, and you want to add another
network ('internal' or otherwise) then it should be just added to the
TRUSTED entry as ultimately it does exactly the same thing (both get deemed
as "trusted" and bypassed with the "shortcircuit ALL_TRUSTED" option set, as
shown above). Only without a 'trusted' entry will an 'internal' entry get
applied.
I think we have all learned something there.
Thanks to all.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Advice-why-one-relay-evaluated-and-not-the-other-tp121145p121217.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
