Am 09.08.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Kevin Golding:
Based on what you're trying to do:

man dig

don't help, see below

or depending on your resolver possibly:

man drill

don't help, see below

Whilst I agree it is slightly more effort to set-up whitelisting by
looking up the details first it would still be far more resource
efficient on your servers

that don't catch the problem if the MX changes that you need to permanently watch your "whitelist_from_rcvd" and maintain them

his point is pretty sure that he want to be able to rely on the senders DNS like whitelisting by DKIM or SPF does

given the amount of DNS records in summary (RBL, URIBL, DKIM, SPF) that single one is not a topic for "more resource efficient" and in any case outweights the maintainance burden of "whitelist_from_rcvd" lines

Reply via email to